skip to Main Content
Scott Tipton (Colorado 03)

Scott Tipton (Colorado 03)

Campaign contributions

Financial companies and their executives have been massive funders of Rep. Tipton’s political career. In all, he has taken well over $1.5 million[1] from individuals and PACs associated with banks, payday lenders, and other financial and real estate interests – more than from any other sector of the economy.

Rep. Tipton’s top corporate benefactors since 2005
include the Land Title Guarantee Company ($52,400), Bancroft Investments
($37,500), and Vicki Lee Green Realtors ($36,450). During the current election cycle,
he has collected contributions from the Land Title Guarantee Company ($12,500),
Bancroft Investments ($10,000), Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria ($10,000), the
American Institute of CPAs ($10,000), the American Bankers Association ($9,000),
Sturm Financial Group ($8,100), Cobank ($7,850), the American Investment
Council ($7,500), the Investment Company Institute ($7,000), Citigroup
($6,000), the National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors
($6,000), KPMG ($5,500), the High Valley Group ($5,400), Morgan Stanley
($5,250), Capital One Financial ($5,000), the National Apartment Association
($5,000), Charles Schwab ($5,000), PricewaterhouseCoopers ($5,000), Ernst and
Young ($5,000), the Independent Community Bankers of America ($5,000), the
American Land Title Association ($5,000), Deloitte LLP ($5,000), Wells Fargo
($5,000), Discover Financial Services ($5,000), the Independent Insurance
Agents and Brokers of America ($5,000), and many others.

Voting
record

In 2017 and 2018, Americans for Financial Reform (a coalition of more than 200 consumer and other public-interest groups) tracked 38 House floor votes and 36 Financial Services Committee votes – 74 votes altogether – on measures making it easier for Wall Street banks and other financial companies to make reckless bets or take unfair advantage of consumers, investors, or workers, or endanger the safety and stability of the overall financial system and the economy. Rep. Scott Tipton voted for 73 out of 74, including proposals to:

●  Sharply reduce the funding, powers, and
political independence of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, making it
easier for mortgage lenders, payday lenders, and credit card companies, etc. to
stick customers with hidden fees and unexpected charges (HR 10, voted
for
);

●  Repeal the “Volcker Rule,” which bars the big
Wall Street banks from playing reckless games with insured deposits and other
taxpayer-subsidized funds (HR 10, voted
for
);

●  Roll back consumer credit safeguards for
mobile (or manufactured) homes, making it easier to steer borrowers into
high-cost loans with excessive fees and interest – in an industry that has long
been rife with such abuses (HR 1699, voted
for
);

●  Weaken oversight of the Big 3 credit ratings
agencies, Moody’s, Standard & Poors, and Fitch, which made huge sums of
money by slapping triple-A ratings on toxic mortgage-backed securities in the
run-up to the financial crisis (HR 3911, voted
for
);

●  Give Wall Street banks and other large
financial companies a new way to undo rules they dislike, by requiring the
explicit approval of both houses of Congress before any major regulation takes
effect (HR 26voted
for
); and

●  Strip consumers of the right to band together
and take banks and other financial companies to court over systematic
wrongdoing, leaving people with no recourse except to submit an individual
complaint to a corporate-friendly private arbitration firm. This is a system
that effectively operates as a corporate Get out of Jail Free Card, since the
damage to any one victim of financial industry fraud and trickery is rarely
large enough to justify the cost of legal action, and arbitration proceedings
are usually kept under wraps. (HJ Resolution 111, voted
for
)

Scott Tipton also
voted for the
Republican tax-cut plan (HR 1), from which big banks and
financial companies – and their executives – stand to gain hundreds of billions
of dollars, with the scandal-ridden Wells Fargo poised to be the leading corporate beneficiary.

And in May 2018, his support helped win passage of the
biggest rollback of banking regulations since the financial crisis. Backers
of this legislation (S 2155) described it as an effort to
provide regulatory relief for small “community banks”; but that’s a well-honed
Wall Street marketing pitch for bills whose chief beneficiaries, as a rule, are
much larger and less sympathetic institutions. In fact, the core provision of
S 2155 freed a group of 25 banks with $50-$250 billion in assets from the
heightened oversight put in place after the 2008-09 financial crisis. Far from
protecting community banks, S 2155 will spur increased bank consolidation
by letting a $50 billion institution grow up to five times bigger without
attracting any extra regulatory scrutiny – a point acknowledged by industry insiders
as soon as the bill passed. Its other unadvertised features included a
significant weakening of safeguards against predatory or racially
discriminatory lending, especially in rural areas of the country. Senator
Elizabeth Warren dubbed it The “Bank Lobbyist Act.”

All these votes occurred during the
115th Congress, which has done next to nothing
about the serious problems facing ordinary Americans (health care, housing,
etc.). If you’re wondering how the same elected body could somehow manage to
act on item after item from Wall Street’s legislative wish list, the answer
lies with Scott Tipton and the far too many other
lawmakers like him who have built their congressional lives around the pursuit
of campaign donations from big banks, securities firms, payday lenders, and
other giant financial companies.

When it comes to the issues that
Wall Street banks and other financial firms care about, Tipton
has ignored not only the interests but the will of the people he is sworn to
represent. Ten years after the financial crisis, the great majority of voters –
across lines of geography and political party – voice their support for
existing regulations and say they would like to see the rules governing Wall
Street and the financial world made tougher. Yet in all the actions described
here, Rep. Tipton has not once taken a stand for
stronger rather than weaker regulation of banks, lenders, and other financial
entities.


[1] On 9/18/18, OpenSecrets.org showed Rep.
Tipton with a total of $1,584,466 in FIRE sector contributions, based on data
reported to the Federal Elections Commission and compiled by the Center for
Responsive Politics. Like other dollar amounts cited here, this number can be
updated by clicking the link to CRP’s website.

Back To Top